2025:HHC:46477 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.757 of 2019 Decided on : 31.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Bhupal Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of HP and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for Respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate vice Mr. Abhinav M. Goel, Advocate, for Respondent No.3. Name of Respondent No.4 who is stated to have died, stands deleted, vide order dated 27.11.2025. Mr. Prem P. Chauhan, Advocate, for Respondents No.5 to 7. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Due to subsequent events, Learned Counsel for the petitioner, states that instant petition may be given a closure as the petitioner as well as most of the private respondents have superannuated also [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Based on the statement made by Learned 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:46477 Counsel for the petitioner, which is not opposed by Learned State Counsel and Learned Counsel for Private Respondents also, instant proceedings are closed. In aforesaid terms, instant petition stands disposed of alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge December 31, 2025 [Bhardwaj]