Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30155 (KAR)

SANJAY MOHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/7491/2024 · 2025-03-04

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9207 CRL.P No. 7491 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7491 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SANJAY MOHAN, S/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A NO-586, THIRUMALA, ARSHINA, KUNTE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 562 123. 2. MOHAN, S/O H.VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/A NO.586, THIRUMALA, ARSHINA, KUNTE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 562 123. 3. GEETHA MOHAN, W/O MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/A NO.586, THIRUMALA, ARSHINA, KUNTE, NELAMANGALA, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 562 123. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUBAIR K.M., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by R HEMALATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9207 CRL.P No. 7491 of 2024 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY MYSURU CITY WOMEN P.S., REP. BY THE S.P.P. OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. PANNAGA B.S., W/O SANJAY MOHAN, D/O BALASUBRAMANYA S.T., AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/A NO.906, 17TH MAIN, D BLOCK, J.P.NAGARA, MYSURU CITY, BENGALURU - 570 031. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.ANOOP KUMAR, HCGP) THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED FIR DATED 16.07.2024 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 MYSURU CITY WOMEN POLICE STATION IN CR.NO.78/2024 PURSUANT TO PRIVATE COMPLAINT IN PCR.NO.24/2024 DATED 10.04.2024, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 498-A, 504, 506, 34 OF IPC, SEC. 3 AND 4 OF DP ACT, PENDING ON 7th ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, MALALAVADI, JAYANAGAR, MYSURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9207 CRL.P No. 7491 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER Memo is filed seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the final report. 2. Memo is filed on record. 3. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdraw reserving liberty as sought for. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 99