IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 234 of 2016 Date of Decision : 4.11.2025 Pradeep Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Ms. Pallavi Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Prashant Sen, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) As per report petitioner/accused has expired on 13.8.2020; hence, the proceedings have abated against him and the criminal revision is dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 4th November, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.