2025:HHC:46445 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.1009 of 2016 Decided on : 31.12.2025 __________________________________________________________ Rajesh Kumar Sharma .....Petitioner Versus Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. [SJVNL] and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. K.S. Banyal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Uday Singh Banyal, Advocate, for Respondent No.1- SJVNL. Ms. Manisha Thamta, Advocate vice Mr. Prashant Chaudhary, Advocate, for Respondents No.2 to 10. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Mr. Mohit Sharma, Learned Vice Counsel, on Instructions of Learned Original Counsel, Mr. Manish Sharma, states that due to subsequent events, petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings [Statement is Taken on Record]. 2. Based on the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, which is not opposed 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:46445 by Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1-SJVNL and Learned Vice Counsel for Private Respondents also, instant proceedings are closed. In aforesaid terms, instant petition stands disposed of alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge December 31, 2025 [Bhardwaj]