Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24271-DB RP No. 259 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR REVIEW PETITION NO. 259 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVAREDDY, AGA)
AND:
PRABHAKARA BALAKRISHNA S/O LATE M. BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, NO.66, COVER ROAD, COX TOWN, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE FINAL ORDER DATED 20.11.2024 RENDERED IN WRIT PETITION NO.49169/2017 (S-KAT) AND DISMISS THE SAID WRIT PETITION WITH COSTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24271-DB RP No. 259 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
The petitioners-State Authorities filed this review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC have sought to review the order dated 20.11.2024 in W.P.No.49169/2017 whereunder, the respondent’s writ petition questioning the
order dated 24.10.2024 passed by the Tribunal, dismissing the challenged to order of dismissal dated 16.06.2006 was allowed.
2. Heard learned AGA Sri.Shivareddy for review petitioners and perused the entire review petition papers.
3. The review jurisdiction could be exercised in terms of
Order XLVII Rule 1 of PCC and that too when the petitioner points out an error apparent on the face of the record. In the instant case, the ground raised by the learned AGA is not an error. The grounds of appeal cannot be the grounds for review.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24271-DB RP No. 259 of 2025
4. There is no error apparent on the face of record and the review petition is liable to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1