Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30138 (RAJ)

RAHUL SON OF SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR v. UMESH SON OF SHRI CHAGANLAL

CW/14259/2025 · 2025-09-25

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14259/2025 1. Rahul Son Of Shri Bhawani Shankar, Aged About 38 Years, Granson Of Shri Rajkishore 2. Abhishek Son Of Shri Jagdish Grandson Of Shri Rajkishore, Aged About 19 Years, Both Residents Of Ward No. 09, Mohlla Khasapura, Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj). ----petitioners Versus Umesh Son Of Shri Chaganlal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 09, Mohalla Khasapura, Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj). ----Respondent For petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Kumar Jha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishikesh Maharishi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 25/09/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with a challenge to order dated 22.08.2025, passed by the learned Civil Judge & Judicial Magistrate, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) in case No.64/2025, whereby the prayer for interim relief was rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners after making submissions at some length has made a limited prayer that the learned Trial Court may be directed to decide the Temporary Injunction (in short ‘T.I.’) Application finally within a stipulated period. He further submits that the suit was filed on 03.07.2025 [2025:RJ-JP:39661] (2 of 2) [CW-14259/2025] alongwith the application for T.I.. He also submits that the reply to the T.I. Application has already been filed by the defendants/respondents. 3. Heard. 4. Considered. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, so also the submission made by him that the defendants/respondents are continuing the construction over the suit premises, the Court deems just and proper to direct the learned Court Below to decide the T.I. Application at the earliest and preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of as above. 7. The stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /252