T \ APHC010433942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22077 OF 2025 Between; Age 40 years, 1. K. Nazeer Ahamed, S/o.Late K.Mabu Sab R/o,Baicherigeri Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 2. K.Nabi Rasul, S/o.Late K.Mabu Sab, Age39 years, R/o.Baicherigeri Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 3. Katika Mabbi, D/o.Late K.Mabu Sab Age 35 years, R/o.Baicherigeri Village, Adoni Mandal, Kurnool District. 4. K.Maimum Bee, D/o.Late K.Mabu Sab W/o.Shekshavali Age 34 years, R/o.Devi Nagar, Karur, Bellary District, Katnataka State. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati at Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Station House Officer, ISVI Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District. 5. Smt. Raheema Bee, W/o.Azeez Sab Age 54 years, Occ Housewife, Mobile Bhavanipet, Sholapur, Maharashtra State. R/o.D. No. 10-32 No.9421021056. / ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the 4*^ Respondent in interfering the civil disputes and the failure of the Respondents 2 and 3 in taking action against the 4‘^ Respondent on the complaint/legal notice, dt. 16.07.2025 given on behalf of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to take action against the 4“^ Respondent in interfering in civil disputes and further direct the 4^'^ Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^^ Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes and desist from calling the petitioners to Police Station without there being registered pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5:— The Court made the following order: any crime \ APHC010433942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22077/2025 Between: 1.K NAZEER AHMED, S/0.LATE K.MABU SAB AGE 40 YEARS, R/0 BAICHERIGERI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. AGE39 YEARS, 2.K.NABI RASUL, S/0.LATE K.MABU SAB, R/0.BAICHERIGERI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.KATIKA MABBI, D/O.LATE K.MABU SAB R/O.BAICHERIGERI VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4 K MAIMUM BEE D/O.LATE K.MABU SAB W/O.SHEKSHAVALI AGE 34 KATNATAKA AGE 35 YEARS, YEARS, R/0.DEVI NAGAR, KARUR, BELLARY DISTRICT STATE.’ ...PETITIONER(S) AND REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARY AMARAVATI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI, KURNOOL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.SMT RAHEEMA BEE, W/O.AZEEZ SAB R/O.D.NO.10-32 ISVI POLICE STATION, ADONI AGE 54 YEARS, OCC BHAVANIPET, SHOLAPUR, HOUSEWIFE MAHARASHTRA STATE. MOBILE NO.9421021056. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.KSITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; the action of the 4th Respondent 'hteifenng the civil disputes and the failure of the Respondents 2 and ndticfdt Tea? ^ f^^f^pondent on the complalnt/legal arhitran H Qiven on behalf of the petitioner is illegal arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to take further direct the 4th Respondent not to Interfere in civil disputes. ” in 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on have not received representation from the Petitioners. It is further submitted that there disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5. Since the matter is of Civil nature, the Police parties. written instructions, would submit that the Police any are civil never interfere with the civil disputes between the 3. Sri K.Sitaram, learned counsel for the Petitioners would Police are insisting the Petitioners to handover submit that, the possession over the property to the unofficial Respondent since she suffered a civil decree. Learned counsel would further submit that A.S.No.39 of 2019 is also pending before the learned II Additional District Judge, Kurnool 4. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition i disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and the IS unofficial Respondent. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department of Home, State of Andhra I at Velagapudi, Guntur 1. The Principal Secretary, Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati District. \ 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District at Kurnool. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Adoni, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Station House Officer, ISVI Police Station, Adoni, Kurnool District. 5. One CC to Sri K. Sita Ram, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies. r ssb / HIGH COURT DATED:28/08/2025 ORDER WP No. 22077 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS