949+950+952+953+954+955 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CONT. PETITION NO. 620 OF 2015 IN WP/1233/2015 Somnath Kondaji Mhaske VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. R. R. Bangar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … AND 950 CONT. PETITION NO. 634 OF 2015 IN WP/1229/2015 Sagar Sampat Jorvekar VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. Rajesh Mewara, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … AND 952 CONT. PETITION NO. 639 OF 2015 IN WP/791/2015 Subhash Ganpat Varpe VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mrs. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. Avinash Borulkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … komal kamble Page|1 2025:BHC-AUG:25098-DB 949+950+952+953+954+955 AND 953 CONT. PETITION NO. 170 OF 2016 IN WP/1230/2015 Madhukar Bala Gunjal VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. Rajendra Sanap, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … AND 954 CONT. PETITION NO. 172 OF 2016 IN WP/1235/2015 Tarabai Maruti Raut VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. Nandkishor Yadav, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … AND 955 CONT. PETITION NO. 173 OF 2016 IN WP/790/2015 Laxman Baburao Gunjal VERSUS The Union Of India And Others … Mr. Patil Vikramsinh P., Advocate for the Petitioner – Absent Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondent/s – State Mr. Nitin Tribhuvan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 … komal kamble Page|2 949+950+952+953+954+955 CORAM : N. B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 O R D E R : 1. Learned advocates for the respondents have placed on record communication dated 15.09.2025 addressed by Competent Land Acquisition Authority informing them that enhanced compensation is paid to the petitioners, as per the chart given in the said communication. Communication is marked ‘X’ for identification purpose. 2. In view of the compliance of the order, contempt petitions are disposed of. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (N. B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble Page|3