PRADEEP ALIAS GOLU S/O GIRIRAJ @ GIRRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11593/2025 · 2025-09-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30112 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38089] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11593/2025 Pradeep Alias Golu S/o Giriraj @ Girraj, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khandiya Colony, Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jhalawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena Mr. Akash Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/09/2025
1. The present bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS are filed by the applicants-accused Pradeep Alias Golu S/o Giriraj @ Girraj seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.504/2025 dated 26.07.2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali Jhalawar, District - Jhalawar, for the offence under Sections 121(1), 132 and 352 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time.
[2025:RJ-JP:38089] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11593/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for applicant submits that allegation upon present applicant is to assist Naresh Meena, who was granted bail by this Court on 04.09.2025. He further submits that though there are 27 criminal cases registered against present applicant-accused, but most of them are disposed of. He further submits that present applicant-accused is just pleading for parity with those accused, who were granted bail by this Court. He also submits that in the instant case, the role and involvement of present applicant-accused is not proved and the Trial Court has dismissed the bail only on the ground of pendency of criminal cases, which is not material in the instant case. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Having considered submission of learned counsel for applicant and learned Public Prosecutor and also perusing the report, it is apparent on record that two accused Murari Lal and Naresh Meena, were granted bail by this Court in the instant case. Naresh Meena is also having pendency in criminal cases, but considering the involvement in present case, it is appropriate to grant benefit of parity. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in
[2025:RJ-JP:38089] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11593/2025] the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Pradeep Alias Golu S/o Giriraj @ Girraj, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /27