1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 486 of 2015 Smt. Rajinbai W/o Ramgopal Ratre Aged About 42 Years, caste Satanami, R/o Village Hirri, Tahsil-Sarangarh District (Revenue And Civil) Raigarh Chhattisgarh At Post Ratre Poultry Farm, Sarangarh Road Sarasiwan Tahsil And Police Station Bilaigarh District (Revenue And Civil) Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh --- Appellant/Applicant versus 1 – IFFCO TOKYA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, R/o 3rd Floor Shop No. 345-347, Lalganga Shoping Mal. G.I. Road, Raipur District (Revenue And Civil) Raipur, Chhattisgarh (iNSURER OF THE Motorcycle Platina No.CG-13-H- 1322 2 - (Deleted) Bishesar Ratre S/o As Per Honble Court Order Dated 08-03-2022 And 20-10-2022 --- Respondent(s) MAC No. 114 of 2022 1 - Pekram S/o Jagannathiya Kurre Aged About 40 Years 2 - Smt. Rammati W/o Pekram Kurre Aged About 39 Years Both R/o Village Sardhabhatha, Tahsil And Police Station Bilaigarh, District Raipur At Present Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. - Appellants/Applicants Versus 1 - Ankita Ratre D/o Late Bishesar Ratre Aged About 17 Years 2 - Priyanka Ratre D/o Bishesar Ratre, Aged About 15 Years 3 - Rishabh Ratre S/o Bishesar Ratre, Aged About 13 Years 4 - Krishna Ratre S/o Bishesar Ratre Aged About 11 Years 5 - Kiran Ratre Wd/o Late Bishesar Ratre Aged About 36 Years Respondents No.1 to 4 are minor through the mother (natural guardian) Kiran Ratre, Wd/o Late Bishesar Ratre: aged about 36 years, All R/o Village Hirri, Post Office Godam, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 6 – IFFCO TOKYA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, R/o 3rd Floor, Shop No. 345-347, Lalganga Shoping Mal, G.E. Road, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of The Motor Cycle Platina No. C.G. 13 H 1322) --- Respondent(s) Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.01.17 17:56:18 +0530 2 For Appellants/applicants : None appears. For Respondent 1 in MAC No. 486/2015 and for respondent 6 in MAC No.114/2022 : Shri Pravesh Sahu appears on behalf ofShri P.R. Patankar, Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 17/01/2025 1. None for the appellants when the above captioned appeals are called nor there is any representation on behalf of them. Even on 03.12.2024, none had appeared on behalf of the respective appellants. 2. In the above circumstances and in the absence of any representation, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss these appeals for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani