IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 73 of 2015 Date of Decision : 30.10.2025 Shambhu Dayal ....Petitioner Versus Amar Chand ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Nimish Gupta, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Memo of appearance $led on behalf of the respondent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner had expired; hence, the proceedings have abated against him and the criminal revision is dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 30th October, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.