Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3010 (UTT)

DR. RASHMI ARYA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/476/2016 · 2025-06-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 09.06.2025 WPSB No. 476 of 2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Vashisth, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.06.2025 Mahinder/