SURESH MALAKAR SON OF SHRI SANJAY MALAKAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/11/2025 · 2025-01-13
Pankaj Bhandari, Shubha Mehta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3010 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3010 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 11/2025 Suresh Malakar Son Of Shri Sanjay Malakar, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of B-42, Surjan Vihar, Swej Farm, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur.
4. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur.
5. SHO Police Station Sodala, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur.
6. Ashok Kumar Yadav Son Of Unknown, Resident Of E-4, Rajbhawan Staff Quarter, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.)
7. Pushpa Devi W/o Ashok Kumar Yadav, Resident Of E-4, Rajbhawan Staff Quarter, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Jaiprakash Yadav Son Of Ashok Kumar Yadav, Resident Of E-4, Rajbhawan Staff Quarter, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.)
9. Guddu Yadav Son Of Ashok Kumar Yadav, Resident Of E- 4, Rajbhawan Staff Quarter, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.)
10. Bittu Yadav Son Of Ashok Kumar Yadav, Resident Of E-4, Rajbhawan Staff Quarter, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijesh Kumar Bhardwaj with Mr. Ravindra Singh Thakur For State : : : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Surendra Singh, CI SHO PS Sodala, Jaipur City Ms. Manju, MFC 13109, PS Sodala, Jaipur City
(2 of 2) [HC-11/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 13/01/2025
1. Petitioner has preferred this habeas corpus petition seeking production of corpus who happens to be wife of petitioner.
2. Corpus has been produced before the Court. We appreciate the efforts put in by the police.
3. We have interacted with the corpus. She has stated before the Court that she wishes to go with petitioner.
4. Since corpus has stated before the Court that she wishes to go with petitioner, we deem it proper to allow the habeas corpus petition.
5. Habeas Corpus Petition is accordingly, allowed.
6. Corpus is free to go with the petitioner.
7. Respondent No.5-Jaiprakash Yadav who is present in Court is cautioned not to threat or trouble the petitioner and the corpus.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J HEENA/87