Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 301 (UTT)

ADITYA SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1061/2025 · 2026-03-25

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 1061 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri and Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holders for the State. 3. On the previous date the State was directed to get instructions in reference to the statement as given in paragraph 5 and 6. 4. Today, on instructions, Mr. Joshi, learned A.G.A. apprise to this court that in reference to the statement as given in paragraph 5 and 6 the petitioners have not any consent for making such a statement. 5. The written instructions of the Inspector Incharge of Thana Kankhal dated 24.03.2026 is placed before this court and I perused the same. It appears that the petition filed by the petitioner is completely frivolous particularly the statement as given in paragraph 5 and 6, the justification as given by the petitioners before the Inspector Incharge that petitioners have not given any consent to the counsel is also appears to be a misleading one. 6. In such view of the matter, the instant writ petition is dismissed. 7. Personal appearance of the Inspector Incharge is exempted. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 25.03.2026 PR