MAYANK KUMAR ALIAS MAYANK MODI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./3382/2024 · 2025-01-03
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30089 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30089 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 3382 of 2024
Mayank Kumar @ Mayank Modi, aged about 30 years, son of Arjun Modi, resident of Village-Anantdih, P.O.-Pathaldiha and P.S.-Koderma, District-Koderma (Jharkhand).
..... … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Ramlal Das, S/o Late Jhaman Das, resident of village-Behradih, P.O. and P.S.- Koderma, District-Koderma.
..... … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sachin Mahto, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. ------
03/ 03.01.2025 This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 17.10.2024, passed in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 251 of 2024 by this court.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the anticipatory bail was allowed in favour of the petitioner, in which, one of the condition was put that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on each and every date. He submits that the petitioner is working as Design Engineer in Bangalore with Electrical and Avionics Department of S.I. Lab and it is very difficult to appear on each and every date before the learned trial court. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to appear before the learned trial court whenever it is necessary and if the trial court directs to appear. He submits that in view of that that part of the condition may kindly be modified.
3.
Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection to that effect.
4.
Considering that the anticipatory bail has already been provided in favour of the petitioner and in view of the submissions of
-2-
the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the said condition is modified to the extent that the petitioner will file representation under Section 317 Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 355 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the learned trial court and whenever the petitioner is required to appear before the learned trial court, he will appear.
5.
The order dated 17.10.2024, passed in Criminal Appeal (SJ) No. 251 of 2024, is modified to the above extent.
6.
With the above observation, this petition is disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-