APHC010433562024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3899/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK DARIYAVALLI, S/O. MASTAN AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC- DAILY WAGER. R/O. 13 136 9/1, MASIDU BAZAR, PINAPADU, TENALI, GUNTUR, A P 522202. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR MEENA IAS DISMISSED, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC- PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE CONTEMPT CASE NO 3899 OF 2024 IS DISMISSED AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.1 AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20.06.2025 2. SRI S NAGA LAKSHMI IAS, D/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC- DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI M SUVARNA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC-TAHSILDAR, KROSURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SRI MALLA CHANDAMAMA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC-PRESIDENT KROSURU GRAMA PANCHAYAT KROSURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI RAJA NAYAK, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC-EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDINGS GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 HBKM,J C.C.No.3899 of 2024 6. SRI KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC- DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS SUB DIVISION SATTENAPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLA YASWANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. V SRINIVASULA REDDY 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. Y BALAJI 3 HBKM,J C.C.No.3899 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. 2. On the last occasion also there was no representation for the petitioner. However, on the last occasion itself, the learned counsel appeared for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that the order under contempt has already been complied with by issuing notice under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and the due process of enquiry is still pending. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.5 and 6 also submits that the order under contempt has already been complied with as stated above. 4. In view of the above said compliance of the order under contempt by the respondents and as the enquiry is pending under the above said Section 7 notice as per law, no further orders are necessary in this contempt case. 5. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 01.08.2025 PGT