RAKESH KUMAR GOKHROO (AY 2014-15) S/O SHRI PARAS CHAND GOKHROO v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CW/14030/2025 · 2025-09-17
Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30079 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37883-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14030/2025 Rakesh Kumar Gokhroo (AY 2014-15) S/o Shri Paras Chand Gokhroo, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 302, Royal Ensign, Prithviraj Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Power of Attorney Holder Shri Paras Chand Gokhroo S/o Late Raj Mal Gokhroo, Aged 73 Years, R/o 302, Royal Ensign, Prithviraj Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur-
302001. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, 416, 4th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-2, LIC Building, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302005.
2. Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Aayakar Bhawan, Paota-C Road, Jodhpur-342010, Rajasthan.
3. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur-302005, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanuj Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna with Mr. Meyhul Mittal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/09/2025
1. This petition is completely premature as only notices under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been issued, to which the petitioner may file reply.
[2025:RJ-JP:37883-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-14030/2025]
2. It is of course need not be mentioned that the respondents shall pass a speaking order on the basis of the reply and hearing to be provided to the petitioner.
3. Accordingly, the present Civil Writ Petition is dismissed in view of the aforesaid observations.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AMIT/55