Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30076 (AP)

DAMA CHENDRAMOULI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/22742/2023 · 2025-09-02

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010432442023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22742/2023 Between: 1. DAMA CHENDRAMOULI, S/O. ANKAIAH , AGE ABOUT 47 YEARS, GUDAVALUR VILLAGE , KONDAPURAM MANDADAM, S. P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KAVALI TOWN. SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALIGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL. SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KONDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 calling the petitioner to appear before the 5th respondent police station 2 from morning to evening in every Sunday by affixing his photo as suspect person as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and apart from against to the standing order 601 (Old 701) of the A. P. Police Standing Orders and consequently set aside the suspect sheet on the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may pleased to direct the 5th respondent not insist him to present before him every Sunday until disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 5 calling the petitioner to appear before the 5th respondent police station from morning to evening in every Sunday by affixing his photo as suspect person as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and apart from against to the standing order 601 (Old 701) of the A. P. Police Standing Orders and consequently set aside the suspect sheet on the petitioner and pass……” 2. Sri Dr.G.V.Ravi, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025 MH 4 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 23 WRIT PETITION NO: 22742/2023 Dt.03.09.2025 MH