Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30075 (KAR)

PRAKASH C v. SMT D CHANDRAKALA

WP/19544/2025 · 2025-07-14

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25763 WP No. 19544 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19544 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. PRAKASH C., S/O CHIKKEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O NO.20, NAGASAMUDRA ROAD, GAYATHRI EXTENSION, CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 116. 2. SMT. DHANALAKSHMI, W/O PRAKASH C., AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O NO.20, NAGASAMUDRA ROAD, GAYATHRI EXTENSION, CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 116. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVIGOWDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT.D.CHANDRAKALA, D/O D.DEVARAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O ANEKERE VATARA, CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT – 573 116. …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25763 WP No. 19544 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH OF ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN O.S.NO.26/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNARAYAPATNA VIDE ANNEXURE – G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Petitioners are the defendants in a suit in O.S.No.26/2024 instituted by the respondent-plaintiff. 2. Heard Sri.Hanumanthappa B. Haravigowdar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and have perused the material on record. 3. The concerned Court in the said original suit grants an interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Challenging the same, petitioners are before this Court. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25763 WP No. 19544 of 2025 4. If the petitioners are aggrieved by the order of the grant of injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, it is for him to prefer an appeal before the First Appellate Court. Reserving such liberty, if he so desires, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74