Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30075 (CHH)

UMA BELSARIYA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPS/5701/2021 · 2025-09-01

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5701 of 2021 Uma Belsariya W/o Hemlal Belsariya, Aged About 51 Years R/o. Nayapara, Tahsil - Bhanupratapur, District - Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Public Education Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Joint Director, Public Education, Bastar Division, District Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Education Officer, North Bastar, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Block Education Officer, Block Bhanupratapur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 5816 of 2021 Hemlal Belsariya S/o Late Pyarelal Belsariya, Aged About 50 Years R/o. Nayapara, Tahsil - Bhanupratappur, District - Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Public Education Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Divisional Joint Director, Public Education, Bastar Division, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer, North Bastar, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh 5 - Block Education Officer, Block Bhanupratapur, District Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 02/09/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that by efflux of time, these writ petitions have become infructuous. 2. Not opposed by the other side. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim