[2025:RJ-JP:38882] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11613/2025 1. Bharat Lal Meena S/o Ramniwas Meena, R/o Village Bariya, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli, Presently Railway Technician CNW Aalam Marg, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh. 2. Ramkesh Meena S/o Hansraj Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Bariya, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli, Presently Vijay Choudhary PG Jagannathpuri Pratham, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10525/2025 Sushree Reena Meena @ Suman D/o Jagdish Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Maidi, Police Station Hindaun Sadar, District Karauli, Presently Tenant Of House No. 283, Shanti Nagar, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. and Mr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma, Adv., with Mr. Meghraj Meena, Adv., for complainant. [2025:RJ-JP:38882] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11613/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/09/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.506/2025 registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 140(2), 308(6), 127(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that on account of money dispute, this false FIR has been lodged against the petitioners. He further submits that dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He further contends that the petitioners are in custody since 04.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the victim/complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably; absence of criminal antecedents [2025:RJ-JP:38882] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11613/2025] and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Bharat Lal Meena S/o Ramniwas Meena, 2. Ramkesh Meena S/o Hansraj Meena, and 3. Sushree Reena Meena @ Suman D/o Jagdish Meena shall be released on bail provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of these bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/111-112