Paras Ram Vs. Ravi Kumar & Anr. Cr. MP(M) No. 2797/2025 05.12.2025 Present: Mr. Inder Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Surila Sangam, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Ankush Thakur, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 2/State. Cr. MP(M) No. 2797/2025 No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/respondent No. 1 has no objection in case the application is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the application, this Court find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 31 days that has occurred in filing the present revision petition. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 31 days that has occurred in filing the present revision petition, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Revision No. 673/2025 & Cr. MPs No. 5369 & 5381/2025 Notice. Mr. Surila Sangam, Advocate and Mr. Ankush Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2, respectively. ...2... Statement of complainant/respondent No. 1 recorded. The petition is disposed of vide separate order of even date placed on the file. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 5th December, 2025 (raman)