Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30063 (RAJ)

BAL KISHAN S/O SHRI SHIVCHARAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CW/15660/2019 · 2025-05-05

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 767/2019 Santosh Kumari D/o Shri Girdhari Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Garinda, Tehsil Fatehpur, Tehsil And District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And Panchayati Raj Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer Cum Member Secretary, Zila Parishad Barmer 3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Bayatu District Barmer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1638/2019 Munni Dhaka D/o Shri Jabar Mal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bhukhreri, Tehsil Ratangarh, District Churu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And Panchayati Raj Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Chief Executive Officer, Cum Member Secretary, Zila Parishad, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2969/2019 Sobhagya Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Vpo Alabada, Tehsil Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Alwar ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:18874] (2 of 5) [CW-767/2019] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3168/2019 Pradeep Bansal S/o Shri Dharam Prakash Bansal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Jagnath Ji Ka Makan, Shivdas Ghat Ki Gali, Rampura, Kota, District Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To The Government And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Kota. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5596/2019 1. Swatantra Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Vpo Pichuna, Tehsil Roopbas, District Bharatpur. 2. Tej Singh Meena S/o Shri Chhotelal, Age 50 Years, R/o Village Nagla Bhola, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur. 3. Gagendra Singh Meena S/o Shri Nathu Singh Meena, Age 45 Years, R/o Village Akta Tehsil And District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Barmer. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15378/2019 Raj Kumar Soni S/o Sh. Omprakash Soni, Aged About 54 Years, R/o-Baggar, District-Jhunjhunu, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary [2025:RJ-JP:18874] (3 of 5) [CW-767/2019] Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To The Government And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhunjhunu, Raj. 4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Chirawa. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15660/2019 Bal Kishan S/o Shri Shivcharan, Age 39 Years, R/o Kheda Post Sarani Kheda, Tehsil And District Dholpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Rural And Panchayati Raj Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Chief Executive Officer Cum Member Secretary, Zila Parishad, Dholpur 3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Dholpur ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7049/2022 1. Mahaveer Singh S/o Shri Nemichand, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Narsara, Banthod, Tehsile- Fatehpur, Dist- Sikar (Raj.). 2. Mahendra Singh Ranwa S/o Brij Mohan, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village- Tihay, Tehsile- Fatehpur, Dist- Sikar, (Raj.). 3. Parasa Ram S/o Mahadev Prasad, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Fogawata Ki Dhani, Haripura, Palasara, Tehsile And Dist-Sikar, (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To The Government And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, [2025:RJ-JP:18874] (4 of 5) [CW-767/2019] Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Sikar. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7250/2022 1. Ishwar Rathor S/o-Nand Kishor Rathor, Aged About 44 Years, R/o-Behind Post Office, Mangalpura,ward No-14, Jhalawar,dist-Jhalawar,(Raj.). 2. Bajrang Lal Gurjar S/o-Devilal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o- Madari Khan Ka Talab,infront Of Akade Ke Samnay, Jhalawar, Dist-Jhalawar,(Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary To The Government And Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jhalawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttam Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Ms. Sara Pareveen HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 05/05/2025 These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- [2025:RJ-JP:18874] (5 of 5) [CW-767/2019] 1. The petitioners are at liberty to submit their representation(s) with the respondents within a period of four weeks seeking redressal of their grievance(s). 2. The respondents shall pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt with communication of the decision to the petitioners. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/183-191