Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.352 of 2025 Muneesh and others …..….....Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicants Muneesh, Ahsan and Arshad are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.168 of 2024, dated 19.02.2024, under Sections 376(2)(n), 376(3) IPC and Sections 3(a)/4(2), 5(l)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. They have sought their release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4.
This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel.
2
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
7.
Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
03.03.2025 Sanjay