Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30050 (AP)

POOLA SRINIVASULU v. THE VENKATAPURAM GRAMPANCHAYAT

WP/20736/2019 · 2025-08-13

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010431732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 20736/2019 Between: 1. POOLA SRINIVASULU, S/O RAMALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 38YRS, 2. M.G.VENKATA MUNI, S/O LATE KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55YRS 3. KAMATAM CHENGALRAYULU, S/O LATE KANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 67YRS 4. K.ADI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O VENKATA MUNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 35YRS 5. EKAMBARAM MUNI REDDY, S/O RANGA MUNI REDDY AGED ABOUT 42YRS 6. E.CHANDRAKALA, W/ O E. SUBRAM ANYARN AGED ABOUT 36YRS 7. P.MAHESHWAR REDDY, S / O VISHWANADHAM AGED ABOUT 39YRS 8. P.VENKATADRI, S/O VENKATA MUNI AGED ABOUT 32YRS 9. K.SHANKAR REDDY, S/O LATE KANNA REDDY AGED ABOUT 52YRS ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, RESIDENTS OF VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, RENIGUNTA MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE VENKATAPURAM GRAMPANCHAYAT, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE RENIGUNTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENIGUNTA URBAN POLICE STATION RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. M/S INDUS TOWERS LIMITED, S.L.N. TERMINUS, 8TH FLOOR BESIDE BOTANICAL GARDENS GACHIBOWLI, HYDERABAD 5. SURA SIDHAKAR REDDY, S/O RAMACHANDRA REDDY AGED ABOUT 63YRS R/O H.NO 14-32-56-360 PEDDAKAPU STREET, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITON No.20736 OF 2019 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 14.08.2025 kkllkk 47 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.20736 of 2019 14.08.2025 kkllkk