THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. VISHNU PRIYA D/O SHEESH RAM YADAV
SAW/105/2024 · 2025-09-17
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3005 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3005 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37868-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 105/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.22978/2018
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Chittorgarh (Raj.)
4. The Panchayat Samiti Gangrar, District Chittorgarh Through Its Block Development Officer. ----Appellants Versus Vishnu Priya D/o Sheesh Ram Yadav, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Bighana, Post Gandala, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar (Raj) Presently Working On The Post Of Teacher Grade Iii (Level-Ii) Of Subject English At Govt. Ups Motliyas, G.p. Sadi, Block Gangrar, District Chittorgarh (Raj.) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Chinmaya Saxena, Asstt. GC for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 17/09/2025 Heard counsel for the appellant. This special appeal has been filed by the appellants against the order dated 02.05.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed on behalf of the respondent was
[2025:RJ-JP:37868-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-105/2024] allowed. This appeal has been filed by the appellant with an inordinate delay of 1649 days. We have perused the application filed on behalf of the appellant for condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. There is no justifiable reason mentioned in the application for condonation of such a great delay. Counsel for the appellant upon asking of the court has informed that the order passed by the learned Single Judge has already been complied with. In that view of the matter, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act filed by the applicant stands dismissed. Consequently, this special appeal also stands dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /60