I APHC010431392010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A Nos. 1 to 3 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 810 OF 2010 Revision filed under Section 397 R/w 401 of Cr.P.C against the conviction and sentenced by the VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, (FTC), Guntur District, A.P., dt.09-04-2010 and also in the court of the VI Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur passed in CC.No. 739 of 2007, dated 29-04-2009. Between: Gudavalli Kiran, S/o Appa Rao, aged 25 years. Coolie, R/o Sompadu, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of AP. Rep. by its Station House Officer, Vatti Churukuru PS., Guntur District. Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P 2. Munipalli Aruna Jyothi, W/o Mathaiah, aged about 47 years, R/o Sowpadu, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. (R2 is impleaded as per the Court Order dated 26.06.2025 In I.A No.01/2025 in CrI.RC No. 810/2010) ...De-facto Complainant/Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2010(CRLRCMP 1188 OF 2010) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence passed in CrI.A.No. 190 of 2009 on the file of the VIII Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge, (FTC) at Guntur, dt. 09-03-2010 and CC.No. 739 of 2007 on the file o the VI Addl. Munsiff Magistrate, Guntur, dt. 29-04- 2009 and grant bail to the petitioner pending the revision before this Hon'ble Court. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 320(6) r/w 482 of Cr.P.C (359(6) R/w 528 of BNSS) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to compound the offence alleged U/S 324 of IPC. lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Between: Munipalli Aruna Jyothi, W/o Mathaiah, aged about 47 years, R/o Sowpadu, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner/defacto Complainant AND 1. Gudavalli Kiran, S/o Appa Rao, aged 25 years. Coolie, R/o Sompadu Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. ... Respondent/Petitioner 2. The State of AP. Rep by its Station House Officer, Vatti Churukuru PS. Guntur District. Rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P ...Respondent/ Respondent Petition under Section 320(2) r/w 482 of Cr.P.C (359(2) r/w 528 of BNSS) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record compromise in Cr. No.48 of 2007 of Vatti Churukuru PS, Guntur District and Quash the same. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy Counsel for the Respondent No.1 iPublic Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2/defacto Complainant: Sri Y Koteswara Rao The Court made the following order: APHC010431392010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] ■4 / THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO LA-Nos-I to 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 810/2010 Between: Gudavalli Kiran, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd Trgh Churukuru Ps Gun ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The petitioner/accused and the de-facto complainant is present. 2. I.A.No.01 of 2025 is filed to implead the de-facto complainant as Respondent No.2 in this case. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the application, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is allowed, impleading the de-facto complainant as Respondent No.2 to this Criminal Revision Case. i I.A.No.02 of 2025 is filed seeking to permit the petitioner to compound the offence alleged under Section 324 of IPC and I.A.No.3 of 2025 is filed to record the compromise. In the Joint memo filed by the petitioner and Respondent No.2/de-facto complainant it is stated that they have compromised the matter at the intervention of the family and village elders. The joint memo is also signed by the respective counsels. 4. In view of the compromise affected in between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant, the case can be disposed of as compromised. Accordingly, IA.Nos.2 and 3 are allowed. 5. 6. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of compromised by compounding the offence. The petitioner/accused is acquitted and the Judgment of the learned appellate Court and the trial Court are set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. as As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, (FTC), Guntur, Guntur District. m 2. The VI Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. Guntur District 3. One CC to Sri. Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. Y Koteswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 6. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 7. Two CD Copies Stu vna *along with Joint Memo Filed In I.A No.3 of 2025 high court DATED:26/06/2025 COMMON ORDER I.A Nos. 1 to 3 of 2025 in/and CRLRC NO. 810 OF 2010 allowing the I.A NOS. disposing of the criminal 2 AND 3 OF 2025 revision case IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA I. A. NO PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 2, OF 2025 IN CrI.Rc.NO. 810 OF2010 Between; Gudavalli Kiran, S/o Appa Rao Vatticherukuru Mandal. Guntur District. ^ ’ And Petitioner/Accused 1. The state ofA.P., Rep by its Station House officer, Vatti Cherukuru , rep by Its Public Prosecutor High Court 2. Munipajli Aruna Jyothi, W/o Mathaiah aged about 47 years, R/o.Sowpadu Vitticherukuru Mandal, Guntur Dist PS Guntur, OfA.P. ...Respondent/Respondent ....De-facto Complainant/ Proposed Respondent ^OINT MEMO 1. It is submitted that both parties happened are having family relations remembrance of the incident which to be closed relatives and they even having years. Now and living happily. They don’t was happened more than 18 the revision filed by the accused has came up for hearing. 2. The De-facto complainant being a cousin (sister) of the accused came to know about the pendency of the revision and filed a petition to implead her as smooth relations among family members. 3. The matter was settled between both the parties amicably. The content ' V- mentioned in the said Compromise Petition is true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. The said compromise is entered with free will and consent and without any undue influence from any one. . X Hence, we are filing the present joint Memo. Hence this joint memo. Amaravathi, Date : 24-06-2025 S (Petitioner/Accused) Counsel for Petitioner/Accus^d Counsel for Respondent No.2 (Respondent No.2/ Defacto-complainant)