[2025:RJ-JP:37859] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11792/2025 Vijendra Son Of Raghuveer, Resident Of Village Daulatpura, Police Station Sadar, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bhawna Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.180/2025, registered at Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi, for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 281, 110 and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the other co-accused, Harendra and Mahendra, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2025. It is further contended that the injuries sustained by the injured are not dangerous to life. The alleged incident took place suddenly as the complainant allegedly attacked the petitioner. It is also contended that the petitioner did not make any attempt to cause injuries to injured Chogalal rather the complainant came in front [2025:RJ-JP:37859] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11792/2025] of the car and got injured. It is further argued that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025, the charge-sheet has already been submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the petitioner being a driver of the car bearing No.-RJ-33-CA-2355 attempted to run over the vehicle upon the injured Chogalal and the injured Chogalal thereby received fractures at his hand and leg. The entire incident was captured in CCTV footage wherein the petitioner deliberately and knowingly attempted to run over his vehicle on the injured. It is further contended that the bail application of the other co-accused were allowed on the ground that they were not driver of the vehicle and was merely sitting with them additionally. It is also contended that petitioner is a habitual offender and against him several criminal cases are pending, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the allegation levelled against the petitioner and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. The instant bail application filed by the accused-petitioner is hereby dismissed with the liberty to file afresh after recording the statements of the injured Chogalal. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-27