Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3004 (JHR)

PARESH CHANDRA MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./464/2025 · 2025-04-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:11190] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.464 of 2025 ------ Paresh Chandra Mahto, aged about 55 Years, S/o Madhu Mahto, R/o At- Ranadih, PO- Chokahatu, P.S.- Sonahatu, District- Ranchi, State- Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.03 Dated- 11-04-2025 I.A. No.4033 of 2025 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant anticipatory bail application. Since, the hearing of instant anticipatory bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) A.B.A. No.464 of 2025 Apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.12085 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 47 (a) of the Excise Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in the business of illicit country-made liquor. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that no incriminating article has been seized from the possession of the petitioner. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.15,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Complaint Case No.12085 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/