APHC010010612001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 1157/2001 Between: 1. C.VEERA RAGHAVAMMA,, W/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. C.RAMA MOHAN RAO,, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O TALLAMUDI, ELURU DMC 3. C.NAGESWAR RAO,, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O TALLAMUDI, ELURU DMC 4. C. KOTESWAR RAO,, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O TALLAMUDI, ELURU DMC 5. C.SATYANARAYANA,, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O TALLAMUDI, ELURU DMC 6. THOTA BEBI, W/O. JANAKIRAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, VIJAYAWADA V DMC 7. K NAGARATNA KUMARI, W/O AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, VIJAYAWADA V DMC. 8. B. SATYARUKMINIPRASUNAMBA,, W/O ANJANEYULU , AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, VIJAYAWADA V DMC 9. C. PADMAYATHI,, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, KANUMOLU, GANNAVARAM DMC 10. C.VENKATALAKSHMI,, D/O SUBBARAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, TALLAMUDI VILLAGE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, 11. GADI SOMA LINGACHARY,, S/O VEERABHADRA CHARY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. K MARIYAMMA, W/O CHINNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O APPANAVEEDU, E DMC. 2. VENNAVALLI GANDHI, S/O RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O APPANAVEEDU, E DMC ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. . 2. SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SITA RAM The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.1157 OF 2001 J U D G M E N T: Though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”, for several times, the matter is keep on adjourning from time to time on the request of the appellants, but the learned counsel for the appellants are not ready to prosecute the appeal. 2. Event today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Kartheek, learned counsel representing Sri Srinivas Basava, learned counsel for the appellants sought time. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 24.03.2025 Pmk 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.1157 OF 2001 Date:24.03.2025 Pmk