SOUTHERN INSPECTION SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
WP/22010/2025 · 2025-08-19
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30024 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30024 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010431692025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 22010/2025 Between:
1. SOUTHERN INSPECTION SERVICE PRIVATE LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY SHRI. PRASANNA KUMAR THADI, D NO. 9-16- 23/1, 1ST FLOOR,
BRETHREN CHURCH ROAD, 0PP.
RAMATALKIES ROAD, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH - 530 003.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ST), SIRIPURAM CIRCLE, VISAKHAPATNAM - I DIVISION, D NO. 8-1-63/10, 2ND FLOOR, MEHAR PLAZA, NOWKA NAGAR, PEDDA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH - 530 017.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (COMMERCIAL TAX), A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELEGAPUDI.
3. UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (REVENUE), NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI.
4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, IDBI BANK, VISAKHAPATNAM BRANCH BALAJI'S MANGALGIRI CHAMBERS,
9/29/6-1, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 003.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.22010 of 2025
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, direction, or
order A. Quashing the proceedings of the 1st Respondent in the demand
order passed vide Case ID No AD3702240066863 dated 24.07.2024, for the FY 2019-20, denying the Input Tax Credit of IGST Rs. 2,20,185/- and demanding the same along with interest and penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act 2017, on the ground of violation of Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, as the Petitioner is entitled to such credit in light of the extension of time limit for claiming Input Tax Credit for the said period by the Parliament through the retrospective insertion of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act, 2017, as the Petitioner has availed the said credit within the extended time limit B. Consequently, issue a direction or order to set aside the actions of the 1st Respondent in attaching the Bank A/c of the Petitioner in IDBI Bank, Visakhapatnam Branch, Balaji's Mangalgiri Chambers, 9/29/6-1, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam and direct the 4th Respondent to lift the attachment of the Petitioners Bank Account and C. Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the proceedings of the 1st Respondent in demand order passed vide Case ID No: AD3702240066863 dated 24.07.2024, for the FY 2019-20, denying the Input Tax Credit of IGST Rs. 2,20,185/- and demanding the same along with interest and penalty u/s 73 of the COST Act 2017. IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 1st Respondent, to lift the Attachment of the Petitioner’s Bank Account in IDBI Bank, Visakhapatnam Branch, Balaji's Mangalgiri Chambers, 9/29/6-1, Siripuram, Visakhapatnam and drop the recovery proceedings initiated in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. ANIL KUMAR BEZAWADA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
2. 3 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.22010 of 2025
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax, appearing for the respondents. 2.
The petitioner, was assessed to tax, under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST Act”), Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2005 (for short “the APGST Act”) and Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the IGST Act”), by way of an Order, dated
24.07.2024. During the pendency of the assessment, the petitioner sought to take credit available under the credit ledger. However, this request of the petitioner was rejected by the 1st respondent on the ground that the credit was sought, on 28.08.2021, which was 10 months beyond the maximum time available under Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, namely 20.10.2020. 3. Aggrieved by the said order of assessment, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of the present Writ Petition. 4. Sri Anil Kumar Bezawada, learned counsel for the petitioner would rely upon the amended provision of Section 16 wherein sub-section (5) was inserted by a Finance Act, 2024, with effect from 27.09.2024. The relevant provision of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act reads as follows:
“Section-16(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (4), in respect of an invoice or debit note for
4 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.22010 of 2025
supply of goods or services or both pertaining to the Financial Years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21, the registered person shall be entitled to take input tax credit in any return under Section 39 which is filed up to the thirtieth day of November, 2021.”
5. By virtue of this provision, and by virtue of the non-obstante clause available in this provision, the petitioner would be entitled to avail the credit, which was rejected by the 1st respondent, as the credit that is sought to be availed relates to te Financial Year 2019-20. Apart from this, the petitioner sought to avail the credit, on 28.08.2021, which is within the time limit of
30.11.2021. 6.
In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is allowed setting aside the order of assessment, dated 24.07.2024 and the matter is remanded back to the 1st respondent to pass fresh assessment order keeping in view the provision of Section 16(5) of the CGST Act. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_______________ T.C.D.SEKHAR, J
Date: 20.08.2025 MJA
5 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.22010 of 2025
145
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 22010 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
20.08.2025
MJA