1 2025:CGHC:3053 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 429 of 2025 • Smt Kanchan Agre W/o Shir Mahendra Kumar Agre Aged About 37 Years R/o Village - Indalpur Post Lalpur P.S. Lalpur Tehsil Lormi District - Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of School Education Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.). 2. Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.). 3. Director Directorate Of Public Education Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur Raipur (C.G.). 4. Collector District - Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.). 5. District Education Officer District - Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.). 6. Block Education Officer Bilaigarh Block Bilaigarh District - Sarangarh Bilaigarh (C.G.). Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 7. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/01/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “10.1 That the Hon'ble court may please to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the case of petitioner and allow the Krammoanti Vetanaman to the petitioner from the date of completion of eligibility. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner for grant of Krammonati Vetanman and allow the same from the date the petitioner became entitled as per the circulars of the State. 10.4 That this Hon'ble court may further be pleased to pass any other order in favour of petitioner as it may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case with cost.” 3 2. The claim of the petitioner is with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman after completion of 10 years of her service. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent-State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No.261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue as such the petitioner is also entitled for first Kramonnati Vetanman and second Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents No. 2 & 3/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents No.2 & 3 /competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No.261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents No.2 & 3 /competent authority shall consider the same in 4 accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the respondents No. 2 & 3 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 5. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat