Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 30015 (KAR)

DR C M SATHISH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18442/2025 · 2025-07-10

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25237 WP No. 18442 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 18442 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: DR C M SATHISH S/O MAHESHWARAIAH.C.S AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS WORKING AS PRINCIPAL MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL(S.C) KARIGANUR, CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE 560 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY NO. 8, MSB-I, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 570 052. 3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY NO. 8, MSB-I, 6TH AND 7TH FLOOR CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 570 052. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BHOJEGOUDA T KOLLER, AGA FOR R1: SRI SIDDARTHA BABU RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25237 WP No. 18442 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE SIMILAR NATURE QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER BEARING NO. KRIES /ENQR/DISP/43/2025-ADMN/ E-196455 DATED: 18.06.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY HOLDING THE SAME IS ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 10.07.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this writ petition on the ground that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE HA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 70