SRI. SHASHIDHAR NAMBRATH, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/19992/2024 · 2025-06-16
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30010 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 30010 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22723 WP No. 19992 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19992 OF 2024 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. SHASHIDHAR NAMBRATH, S/O DR. C. RAJAGOPALAN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.198, CLASSICS ORCHARDS, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560076 …PETITIONER (BY MS. KUSUMA JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BHARATH K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,.
2ND GATE, 6TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION (PRE UNIVERSITY) 18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22723 WP No. 19992 of 2024
(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21.02.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE E IN TIME BOUND MANNER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking
consideration of representation dated 21.02.2024 (Annexure-E) addressed to the respondent No.2.
3. It is submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate that, the representation made by the petitioner has been considered and rejected by
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22723 WP No. 19992 of 2024
reply dated 16.06.2025 and copy of the same is made available before the court.
3. In that view of the matter, if the petitioner is being aggrieved by the aforesaid reply, the petitioner be challenge the same, if so advised. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61