[2025:RJ-JP:1485] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 415/2025 Santosh Raigar S/o Omprakash Raigar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dahra, Police Station Thanagaji, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.188/2024 registered at Police Station Thanagaji, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 408 & 409 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner has already deposited the amount of Rs.1,45,800/- to the post office. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:1485] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-415/2025] 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already deposited the amount and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Santosh Raigar S/o Omprakash Raigar in connection with FIR No.188/2024 registered at Police Station Thanagaji, District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/94