[2025:RJ-JP:37481] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11643/2025 Raju Gurjar @ Rana S/o Soji Gurjar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Nimdi Ka Chowk, Makadwadi, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aayush Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/09/2025 1. This bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.190/2025 registered at Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 127(4), 332(b), 64(2)(m), 70(1), 75(2), 308(2), 351(3), 115(2), 127(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that perusal of the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS would reveal that there is no allegation against the petitioner of committing rape upon the victim and same has been levelled against co-accused- Satyanarayan, who developed physical relations with her on the [2025:RJ-JP:37481] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11643/2025] pretext of false promise of marriage. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner however, he fairly concedes that no allegation has been levelled against the petitioner of committing rape upon the victim. He submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as four other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, so also the fact that there is no allegation against the petitioner of committing rape upon the victim in the statement of victim recorded under Section 183 of BNSS and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Raju Gurjar @ Rana S/o Soji Gurjar shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court [2025:RJ-JP:37481] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11643/2025] with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. It is made clear that petitioner shall not contact the victim in any manner. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/164