FAROOQ AHMED SHAWL v. PAWAN KOTWAL,SECY.PHE.AND ORS.
CPSW/578/2014 · 2025-07-25
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3000 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3000 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 578/2014 in SWP No. 1227/2014
Farooq Ahmed Shawl
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Pawan Kotwal & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, AC vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (25.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and same was the case on the previous two dates of hearing as well. It appears that the order sought to be enforced may have been implemented and this may be the reason that the petitioner has chosen not to come present in the Court, to prosecute the case. Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 25.07.2025 Diksha
Serial No. 17