Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3000 (JHR)

TUNTUN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./390/2025 · 2025-01-24

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.390 of 2025 ------ Tuntun Yadav, aged about 42 years, S/O Bhagwan Yadav, R/O Vill- Dhamna, P.O.- Dhamanilata, P.S.- Jarmundi, Dist.- Dumka .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shamaiel Raza, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 24-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending her arrest in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.28 of 2024 instituted under Sections 272, 273, 284, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47 (a), 52, 55 of the Excise Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of a vehicle bearing Registration No. WB 73B 6186 which was seized by police while being loaded with huge amount of India Made Foreign Liquor. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-13 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge about her vehicle being involved in any illegal activity. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dumka in connection with Hansdiha P.S. Case No.28 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/