[2025:RJ-JP:37505] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13909/2025 Babu Lal S/o Shri Nemi Chand, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Bandh Baretha, Sookha Seela, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Divisional, Chief Conservator Of Forests, Kota, Rajasthan. 2. Deputy, Conservator Of Forests, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Pareek For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 15/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 09.03.2023 passed by the respondent No.2 - Deputy, Conservator of Forests, Kota. 2. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is per- mitted to file a representation before respondent No.2 - Deputy, Conservator of Forests, Kota, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of four (04) weeks from today; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in the light of the circular dated 22.03.2023 as well as the judgment passed by the Hon'ble [2025:RJ-JP:37505] (2 of 2) [CW-13909/2025] Supreme Court in the matter of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India & Ors.1. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respon- dent No.2 - Deputy, Conservator of Forests, Kota within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 6. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/13 1 2015 (7) SCC 291