IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.1622 of 2019 Decided on:05.12.2025 _________________________________________________________ Radha Krishan ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondents & Others Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. M.L.Sharma,Advocate For the respondents: Mr.   Sumit   Sharma,   Deputy Advocate   General,   for   the respondents­State. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Pursuant to order dated 06.11.2025, Learned State Counsel states that the claimed reliefs  have been granted to the petitioner in terms of Office Order dated 23.09.2024 [Annexure   R­1], Corrigendum   dated 14.11.2024, [Annexure R­II, collectively] and order dated 22.01.2025  [Annexure   R­III].  The   Instructions   dated 28.01.2025 enclosing the above Office Orders are taken on record. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? dispute the above position. 3. In   view     of   the   intervening   events   the proceedings are closed. 4. Pending   miscellaneous   application(s),   if   any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge December 05, 2025 [G.M] 2