1 / 2 2025:CGHC:31210 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2118 of 2025 Mrs Beena Sharma W/o Shishir Prakash Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o Sector No. Street No. 8 Block No. 18 Bhilai District- Durg ( C.G. ). ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Labour Department Through- Station House Officer Bhilai Bhatti Thana Bhilai District- Durg ( C.G. ). 2 - Dr. Shishir Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 45 Years Posted As Assistant Professor, Government Horticulture Vishvavidyalaya R/o Government Horticulture Vishvavidyalaya Tajnandgaon District- Rajnandgaon 3 - Prakash Nath Sharma S/o B.N. Sharma Aged About 71 Years Retd. Emplyee From Bsp R/o R/o Government Horiticulture Vishvavidyalaya Tajnandgaon District- Rajnandgaon ( C.G. ) ( Dead ) 4 - Smt. Kishori Sharma W/o Praksh Nath Sharma Aged About 69 Years R/o R/o Government Horiticulture Vishvavidyalaya Tajnandgaon District- Rajnandgaon 5 - Piyush Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharm Aged About 44 Years Posted As Professor In Physical Education At Kriti Engineering College, Raipur Chhattigarh R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattigarh. 6 - Smt. Pratistha Sharma W/o Piyush Prakash Sharma Aged About 36 Years Posted As Project Officer Under Chhattisgarh Government R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattigarh. 7 - Prasun Jha S/o K. K. Jha Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Surgi, P. S. Surgi , District- Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.07.09 11:33:21 +0530 2 / 2 8 - Smt. Hunjan Jha W/o Prasun Jha Aged About 41 Years Posted As Scientist In Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur R/o Village Surgi, P. S. Surgi, District- Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma Dabhadker, PL (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 08/07/2025 1. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even in the second call none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Under the circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu