[2025:RJ-JP:37717] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14055/2025 Smt. Vimla Devi W/o Late Shri. Umashankar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Baravat, Dubati, Tehsil Mania, District Dholpur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Office Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. The Secretary (Admn.) Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Office, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Deputy Director Works (Headquarter) (Rural), Dholpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Near Waterworks Chouraha, Machkund Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 5. The Executive Engineer (Rural), Dholpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Near Waterworks Chouraha, Machkund Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 6. The Assistant Engineer (Rural), Dholpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Office Near Waterworks Chouraha, Machkund Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Supriya Saxena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 16/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has already filed a representation (Annexure-11) in the Office of respondent No.6- The Assistant Engineer (Rural), Dholpur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, but the same has not been decided as yet. In order to expedite the grievance of not granting ex-gratia compensation of Rs.50 lakhs payable under Regulation 29-A of Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Pension Regulations, 1988, learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if [2025:RJ-JP:37717] (2 of 2) [CW-14055/2025] she is granted an opportunity to file a fresh representation for her grievances as narrated in the present writ petition before the respondent No.2- The Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, with a direction to decide the same expeditiously and in a time bound manner. 2. Heard. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-38