Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29981 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3257/2025 · 2025-03-17

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37849 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Kant Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Kant Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for BSA. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time, fairly submits that petitioner will lodge an FIR or complaint against respondent-4 since alleged act of respondent-4 falls within a criminal offence. 3. Learned counsel for BSA fairly submits that petitioner has a liberty to take legal remedy and in case any query is sought from police authority, he will cooperate. 4. Considering aforesaid submissions and without going into merit of case, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that petitioner (a complainant) will have a liberty to lodge an FIR or complaint, as the case may be, against respondent-4 and police authority will take steps in terms of judgment of Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. and others, 2014 (1) SCC 524. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Sinha_N. Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad