Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2998 (RAJ)

DR. VIRENDRA SINGH MANTH S/O SHRI GOKUL CHAND ARYA v. DR. ARUSHI MALIK, SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

CCP/36/2025 · 2025-08-25

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33526-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 36/2025 1. Dr. Virendra Singh Manth S/o Shri Gokul Chand Arya, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Ceeri Road, Near B.k. Plaza, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Mahender Kumar Baberwal, S/o Shri Sant Kumar Sharma, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Sneh Kunjh, B-31, Ganesh Colony, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 3. Mahesh Kumar Dinodia S/o Shri Babu Lal Dinodia, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Near Nehali Chowk, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. Som Kumar Pareek S/o Shri R.s. Pareek, Aged About 63 Years, R/o A-21, Ganpati Colony, Ceeri Road, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Mohar Singh S/o Shri Omkar Mal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Dev Colony, Ward No. 1, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 6. Richhpal Singh Jat S/o Shri Omkar Mal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Gautam Nagar, Chirawa Road, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Dr. Arushi Malik, Secretary To The Govt., Department Of College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Dr. Om Prakash Bairwa, Commissioner, College Education, Rajasthan, Shiksha Shankul, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. 3. Shri Dinesh Agarwal, Secretary, Managing Committee, M.k. Saboo P.g. College Of Commerce, Rajgarh Road, Pilani, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Govt., Department Of College Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ishwar Lal Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Mr. Manoj Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 25/08/2025 Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue involved in the present petition is covered by decision of this Court dated 21.08.2025 passed in DBCCP No.1666/2018 Dr. Anil [2025:RJ-JP:33526-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-36/2025] Kumar Mathur & ors. vs. Mr Ashutosh A.T. Pednekar & ors. and other connected matters. The contempt petition is dismissed in terms of order dated 21.08.2025 passed in Dr Anil Kumar Mathur (supra). The observations/directions therein shall apply mutatis mutandis in the present case. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/12