IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 Balvir Pal Singh and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the by the appellant/plaintiff for permanent injunction has been dismissed. motion has not been issued so far. The order sheets shows that as many as four times the matter has been listed for he three dates i.e. 19.10.2023, 20.2.2024 and 02.7.2024 the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellant and on the fourth date i.e. the last date of hearing i.e.20 behalf of appellant. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellant. RSA-3050-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.3050 of 2019 Date of decision :-26.03.2025 Versus Pal Singh and another CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant has filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the by the appellant/plaintiff for permanent injunction has been dismissed. The matter pertains to the year 2019 and notice of motion has not been issued so far. The order sheets shows that as many as four times the matter has been listed for he three dates i.e. 19.10.2023, 20.2.2024 and 02.7.2024 the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellant and on the fourth date i.e. the last date of hearing i.e.20.11.2024 there was no representation on behalf of appellant. Even today there is no representation on behalf of appellant. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.3050 of 2019 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The appellant has filed the present appeal against the concurrent findings of the learned Courts below whereby the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for permanent injunction has been The matter pertains to the year 2019 and notice of motion has not been issued so far. The order sheets shows that as many as four times the matter has been listed for hearing. On first three dates i.e. 19.10.2023, 20.2.2024 and 02.7.2024 the matter was adjourned either on request of learned arguing counsel or on request of learned proxy counsel for the appellant and on the fourth date i.e. .11.2024 there was no representation on behalf of appellant. Even today there is no representation on behalf VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.28 19.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellant ha present litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant has adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. neither the applicant in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to March 26 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-3050-2019 A bare reading of the above facts shows that the appellant has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. neither the applicant-appellant nor its counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the same for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. 6, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in the pursuit of the litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the appellant in the interest of justice. On the other hand, the appellant adopted an utterly casual and careless approach. It is clear that counsel are seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other the same for non-prosecution. application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.28 19.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document