RAMSWAROOP S/O SHRI CHIRANJI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14848/2024 · 2025-05-06
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29974 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14848/2024
1. Ramswaroop S/o Shri Chiranji, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Looloj, Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan-322218.
2. Shyam Lal S/o Ram Prasad, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Looloj, Sapotara, , District Karauli, Rajasthan-322218. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through District Collector, Karauli.
2. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli.
3. Patwari, Patwar Mandal Loolok, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli.
4. Om Prakash S/o Shri Ram Sahay Meena, R/o Gangurda, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sumit Rawat JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 06/05/2025
1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that in the interest of justice, your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to direct the respondents No.1 to 3 to made enquiry of the adoption deed cancel the mutation entered in the name of the respondent no.4 of the share land of Late Mithya. Any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.”
[2025:RJ-JP:19077] (2 of 2) [CW-14848/2024]
2. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for issuing against the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to make an enquiry of the adoption deed and cancel the mutation entered into the name of respondent No.4.
3. In the considered opinion of this Court, the relief sought for in this writ petition, cannot be granted by this Court in exercise of its powers contained under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by exercising its inherent jurisdiction, as the disputed questions of
facts and law are involved. If the petitioners feel aggrieved, they can approach the competent Court of law for redressal of their grievance.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands dismissed. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /13