Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2997 (KER)

PERUMUNDA SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT , v. PERUMUNDA GANAPATHY BHAT

AS/615/1996 · 2025-03-14

Kauser Edappagath

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 AS.No. 615 of 1996 ( ) ----------------------- AGAINST THE COMMON JUDGMENT & DECREE IN O.S.NO.107/1979 OF SUB COURT, KASARAGOD. ------------------- APPELLANT/2ND DEFENDANT IN O.S.NO.107/1979: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERUMUNDA SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.PARAMESHWARA BHAT, RESIDING AT PERUMUNDA HOUSE, PERDAL VILLAGE, POST PERDAL, KASARAGOD TALUK. BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SMT.M.R.SREELATHA RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & DEFENDANTS 3 TO 9 IN OS.NO.107/1979 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ *1. PERUMUNDA GANAPATHY BHAT, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O. PERUMUNDA PARAMESHWARA BHAT, RESIDING AT PERUMUNDA HOUSE, PERDAL VILLAGE, POST PERDAL, KASARAGOD TALUK.(DIED, LR'S IMPLEADED) 2. PERUMUNDA SUBRAMANIA BHAT, AGED 36 YEARS, - DO- -DO- 3. PERUMUNDA VENKATRAMANA BHAT, AGED 33 YEARS, -DO- -DO- 4. PERUMUNDA PADMANABHA BHAT, AGED 27 YEARS, -DO- -DO- 5. PERUMUNDA SHAMA BHAT, AGED 23 YEARS, -DO- -DO- **6. PERUMUNDA PARAMESHWARI AMMA, AGED 65 YEARS, WIDOW OF P. PARAMESHWARA BHAT, -DO- (DIED, RECORDED) 7. PERUMUNDA VIJAYALAKSHMI, AGED 25 YEARS, -DO- --2-- AS.No. 615 of 1996 --2-- 8. LAVAN KUMAR (3 YEARS) (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN P.SHANKARANARAYANA BHAT (APPELLANT HEREIN). *LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF R1 *ADDL.R9. SMT.LALITHA, AGED 38 YEARS, W/O.GANAPATHI BHAT, RESIDING AT GULIMOOLA HOUSE, PERUMUNDA, P.O.PALLATHADUKKA, BADIADUKA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD TALUK. *ADDL.R10. EASWARY, AGED 12 YEARS, (MINOR) - DO. *ADDL.R11. SREEKRISHNA PRASANTHA, AGED 7 YEARS, (MINOR), - DO- (MINOR RESPONDENTS 10 AND 11 REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN 9TH RESPONDENT) *ADDL. RESPONDENTS 9 TO 11 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED 1ST RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 16.2.1999 ON C.M.P.4626/1996. **IT IS RECORDED THAT R6 IS DIED AND HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ARE ALREADY IN THE PARTY ARRAY AS R1 TO R5, R7 AND R9 TO R11 AS PER ORDER DATED 20.10.2010 IN MEMO DATED 20.9.2010 CF.NO.5212/2010. R2, R3, R7 & ADDL. R9 TO R11 BY ADV. SRI.P.KESAVAN NAIR R2 & R9 BY ADV. SRI.K.G.CLEETUS R4 & R5 BY ADVS. SRI.P.SHRIHARI SMT.P.VANI THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-06-2015 ALONG WITH AS. 623/1996, THE COURT ON 14/07/2015, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J. ---------------------------------- A.S.Nos.615 & 623 of 1996. ---------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of May, 2015 J U D G M E N T No representation for the appellants. Appeals are accordingly dismissed for default. Sd/-P.B.SURESH KUMAR, Judge. Kvs/- // true copy // PA TO JUDGE.