IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.985 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.11.2025 __________________________________________________________________ Satya Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Ranjana Pathania, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for execution and implementation of judgment dated 17.05.2012, passed by this Court in CWP No.281 of 2011, whereby this Court passed the following order: “2. Therefore, in view of the above, the respondents are directed to grant pay-scale of ₹5480-8925/- to the petitioners from the date of their regularization alongwith arrears, which be released to each of them within a period of two months from the date of production of the copy of this judgment/order.” 2. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 3. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, states that 2 though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of two weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by the learned Additional Advocate General, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. November 20, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge