NIAC Ltd. Vs. Cheeno alias Manish & ors. CMPs No. 23348 and 23349 of 202 5 in FAO No. 577 of 20 08 27.10.2025 Present: Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate for the non- applicant/appellant. Ms.Manjeet Kaur, Advocate vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the applicant/respondent No.2 CMP No. 23348 of 202 5 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicant/ respondent No.2, namely, Miss Baby @ Bandna, for discharging her natural guardian/mother i.e. respondent No.1-Cheeno alias Manisha, as she has attained the age of majority. 2. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant submitted that she doesn't intend to file any reply to the present application and has no objection in case the same is allowed. 3. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2 as well as taking into consideration the fact that she has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her Matriculation Certificate annexed with the application, the present application is allowed and her natural guardian/mother, i.e. respondent No.1 is ordered to be discharged from her guardianship and applicant/respondent No.1 is permitted to pursue the case in her own capacity. 4. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 23349 of 202 5 5. The present application under Section 151 CPC has been maintained by applicant/respondent No.2, Miss Baby @ Bandna for release of award amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, falling in her share and is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2. 6. No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of non-applicant/appellant and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. 7. Heard. Having perused the averments made in the application which are duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.2, coupled with the fact that the judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the entire amount of compensation, falling in the share of applicant/respondent No.2, along with up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in the prayer clause of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge October 27, 2025 (V.Himalvi)