LALLURAM URF LALLULAL SAINI S/O GANESHLAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11880/2025 · 2025-09-20
Praveer Bhatnagar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29964 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29964 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38767] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11196/2025 Dilraj @ Dilkhush S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khabar Kho Police Station Pali Dist. Baran, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11880/2025 Lalluram Urf Lallulal Saini S/o Ganeshlal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Chomp Thana Daulatpura Dist Jaipur West At Present Nalapura Ki Dhani, Chitwari Road, Opposite Bedant School, Thana Daulatpura, Dist. Jaipur West, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Bhatia, Mr. Aadesh Meena, Mr. Bhavkesh Lodha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 20/09/2025
1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 56/2025 registered at Police Station Pali, District Baran for the offences under Sections 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS and Sections 3 and 7 of
[2025:RJ-JP:38767] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11196/2025] the Essential Commodities Act and Section 19 of Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1985.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 10.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 10.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely:
1. Dilraj @ Dilkhush S/o Satyanarayan and 2. Lalluram Urf Lallulal Saini S/o Ganeshlal, in connection with FIR No. 56/2025 registered at Police Station Pali, District Baran, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/14-15